Finally, after a couple weeks of skies ruined by marine layer or wind, I had the chance to observe last night. Seeing was good enough to use full aperture, but not perfect, so I used an apodising mask throughout. I couldn't go down to the limits of the scope, but I was able to see come compelling pairs. Transparency was softened by some marine haze.
I would have observed longer, but the seeing seemed to deteriorate. There should be some more good weather coming.
A 2065 AB: 508; 205x: Very fine pair, white A, 2 delta, very close but nice split. WDS lists as uncertain but the EDR3 data show there is no parallax overlap (by a lot), so these are a comoving but not gravitationally bound pair.
14h 08m 19.11s +16° 43' 32.9" P.A. 342.00 sep 1.6 mag 9.52,11.13 Sp F5 dist. 152.21 pc (496.51 l.y.)
A 1098 AB: 508; 205x: Very light yellow-orange A, 2 delta, well separated B. Not physical (no parallax overlap and proper motions are divergent).
14h 09m 49.14s +08° 22' 04.9" P.A. 282.00 sep 3.8 mag 9.20,11.20 Sp K0
HDS1989 Aa-Ab: 508; 1067x: Light orange, not round at all powers, it is misshapen with a small lump on one side, disks will not resolve. EDR3 does not show any such close companion! Maybe my "not round" is confirmation bias?
14h 10m 55.76s +15° 12' 55.7" P.A. 335.00 sep 0.4 mag 8.53,10.86 Sp G0 dist. 60.46 pc (197.22 l.y.)
A 2065 AB: 508; 205x: Very fine pair, white A, 2 delta, very close but nice split. WDS lists as uncertain but the EDR3 data show there is no parallax overlap (by a lot), so these are a comoving but not gravitationally bound pair.
14h 08m 19.11s +16° 43' 32.9" P.A. 342.00 sep 1.6 mag 9.52,11.13 Sp F5 dist. 152.21 pc (496.51 l.y.)
A 1098 AB: 508; 205x: Very light yellow-orange A, 2 delta, well separated B. Not physical (no parallax overlap and proper motions are divergent).
14h 09m 49.14s +08° 22' 04.9" P.A. 282.00 sep 3.8 mag 9.20,11.20 Sp K0
HDS1989 Aa-Ab: 508; 1067x: Light orange, not round at all powers, it is misshapen with a small lump on one side, disks will not resolve. EDR3 does not show any such close companion! Maybe my "not round" is confirmation bias?
14h 10m 55.76s +15° 12' 55.7" P.A. 335.00 sep 0.4 mag 8.53,10.86 Sp G0 dist. 60.46 pc (197.22 l.y.)
A 1100 AB: 508; 533x: Subtle notched elongation. EDR3 does not show any close companion.
14h 13m 50.60s +08° 58' 51.1" P.A. 173.00 sep 0.2 mag 8.40,9.30 Sp A5
HEI 530 AB: 508; 533x: Very brief split of unequal white stars, with seeing only. EDR3 does not show any close companion
14h 14m 07.87s +10° 55' 46.7" P.A. 353.00 sep 0.5 mag 9.68,10.23 Sp G5
COU 482 AB: 508; 445x: ! Excellent white pair, brief splits with seeing at 205x, easy steady split with six, slightly unequal. Uncertain in WDS, and no parallax data in EDR3
14h 21m 20.69s +30° 50' 07.1" P.A. 121.00 sep 0.6 mag 9.92,9.98 Sp G0
AGC 6 AB: 508; 445x: Small scale split with 205x, easy split with 445x. Near Arcturus, so in wide field it looks like debris from the bright star. No parallax data for the A star in EDR3
14h 33m 55.72s +29° 49' 19.1" P.A. 133.00 sep 0.8 mag 9.81,10.30 Sp G0III
A 347 AB: 508; 445x: Near equal white stars, suspected double at 205x, easy split at 445x. Binary with 236.4-year period.
14h 36m 56.24s +48° 13' 17.9" P.A. 232.80 sep 0.6 mag 8.68,8.37 Sp F2 dist. 106.04 pc (345.9 l.y.)
STT 283 A-BC: 508; 205x: Faint and slightly reddish B, maybe due to faintness, bright white A, well separated. HU 57 BC not tried for, 12.62/11.77 1.2". WDS says A-BC is physical, however there is no parallax overlap -- it's not binary.
14h 32m 30.86s +49° 11' 02.6" P.A. 130.00 sep 5.9 mag 8.08,12.62 Sp F5 dist. 87.41 pc (285.13 l.y.)
COU1586 AB: 508; 205x: Well seen at 205x, very bright white A and faint B hanging close to it, separated. WDS says physical and I'd agree, it's s strong possibility of binarity.
14h 13m 50.60s +08° 58' 51.1" P.A. 173.00 sep 0.2 mag 8.40,9.30 Sp A5
HEI 530 AB: 508; 533x: Very brief split of unequal white stars, with seeing only. EDR3 does not show any close companion
14h 14m 07.87s +10° 55' 46.7" P.A. 353.00 sep 0.5 mag 9.68,10.23 Sp G5
COU 482 AB: 508; 445x: ! Excellent white pair, brief splits with seeing at 205x, easy steady split with six, slightly unequal. Uncertain in WDS, and no parallax data in EDR3
14h 21m 20.69s +30° 50' 07.1" P.A. 121.00 sep 0.6 mag 9.92,9.98 Sp G0
AGC 6 AB: 508; 445x: Small scale split with 205x, easy split with 445x. Near Arcturus, so in wide field it looks like debris from the bright star. No parallax data for the A star in EDR3
14h 33m 55.72s +29° 49' 19.1" P.A. 133.00 sep 0.8 mag 9.81,10.30 Sp G0III
A 347 AB: 508; 445x: Near equal white stars, suspected double at 205x, easy split at 445x. Binary with 236.4-year period.
14h 36m 56.24s +48° 13' 17.9" P.A. 232.80 sep 0.6 mag 8.68,8.37 Sp F2 dist. 106.04 pc (345.9 l.y.)
STT 283 A-BC: 508; 205x: Faint and slightly reddish B, maybe due to faintness, bright white A, well separated. HU 57 BC not tried for, 12.62/11.77 1.2". WDS says A-BC is physical, however there is no parallax overlap -- it's not binary.
14h 32m 30.86s +49° 11' 02.6" P.A. 130.00 sep 5.9 mag 8.08,12.62 Sp F5 dist. 87.41 pc (285.13 l.y.)
COU1586 AB: 508; 205x: Well seen at 205x, very bright white A and faint B hanging close to it, separated. WDS says physical and I'd agree, it's s strong possibility of binarity.
14h 33m 44.62s +43° 00' 28.1" P.A. 143.00 sep 1.8 mag 6.82,10.27 Sp A2 dist. 79.62 pc (259.72 l.y.)
14h 34m 02.12s +45° 00' 12.2" P.A. 27.00 sep 0.8 mag 11.44,11.68 Sp G0
A 1622 AB: 508; 205x: White A and dull-to-reddish B, well separated around 2" and 2 delta mag. Uncertain in WDS, and the EDR3 data back that up with good parallax overlap and only 226 AU separation.
14h 40m 30.40s +46° 32' 32.8" P.A. 254.00 sep 1.9 mag 8.86,10.57 Sp G0 dist. 103.41 pc (337.32 l.y.)
HO 59 AB: 508; 205x: Well separated faint B to bright white A. Not physical
14h 41m 33.22s +44° 22' 40.7" P.A. 9.00 sep 6.8 mag 8.33,11.82 Sp G0 dist. 89.45 pc (291.79 l.y.)
STF1875 AB: 508; 205x: Near equal, well separated white stars. Uncertain in WDS, and while the proper motions are similar there is no parallax overlap, so these are comoving not binary.
14h 43m 38.57s +37° 44' 58.4" P.A. 128.00 sep 3.1 mag 10.22,10.24 Sp F8 dist. 151.29 pc (493.51 l.y.)
KU 49 AB: 508; 445x: A bit hazy, but suspected elongated at 205x, split with 445x. Faint white stars, near equal, more than 1". Uncertain in WDS but pretty good parallax overlap
14h 44m 25.17s +41° 24' 11.3" P.A. 206.00 sep 1.6 mag 10.57,11.03
STT 285 AB: 508: 445x: Nicely split white stars, 1 delta mag, noted the PA with drift. Short period, 88.993-year period, it is at apastron and will hang there for the next decade.
14h 45m 29.74s +42° 22' 56.4" P.A. 74.70 sep 0.5 mag 7.75,8.66 Sp F6V dist. 83.82 pc (273.42 l.y.)
14h 51m 27.53s +44° 55' 42.6" P.A. 4.20 sep 0.7 mag 8.40,8.62 Sp G0 dist. 59.14 pc (192.91 l.y.)
STF1896 AB: 508; 205x: White stars, 1 delta mag, wide. Stelle Doppie gives AB as physical with a 4.23-year period, and an orbital plot -- but with separations of 0.02-0.04". Checking the WDS notes, I find: "AB: Radial velocity variations, based on 10 years of monitoring, indicate the presence of a giant planet orbiting the B component, with P = 1544 +/- 34d, a = 2.62 +/- 0.04 au. M sin i = 1.49 +/- 0.09 Mjup. The primary is an SB in an eccentric orbit with period 25-30 y; mass of Ab 0.5-0.6 Msun. No companions were detected by AO imaging." So it seems SD is giving the orbit of the giant planet! Full paper here.
14h 58m 21.57s +44° 02' 35.9" P.A. 276.00 sep 4.1 mag 8.97,9.47 Sp F8 dist. 96.06 pc (313.35 l.y.)
No comments:
Post a Comment