Saturday, April 13, 2024

another weekday dark sky

Once again, a dark sky window opened on a Tuesday night.  By luck my work schedule was clear Tuesday afternoon, for the drive down, and Wednesday morning, for the drive back.  I went back to the "tranquility base" site, arriving at 7pm.  This time I brought my 4-/8-inch combo refractor, ready to be more productive in my observing.  After setting up I had my picnic dinner, and watched the day-old moon, fresh off its eclipse the day before, setting behind a nearby rocky ridge.  Its earthshine shown in the darkening dusk, and I had the privilege to watch first the thin bright crescent, then the moonshined sphere itself, set behind the ridge.  



After it being more fully dark, I quickly swept up Pons-Brooks near Jupiter in both the 4-inch and 8-inch.  It had a stumpy, broad fan shaped tail, but I did not see any long extensions coming off it.

I didn't have a set observing plan, though I did use my atlas to find different objects in various parts of the sky.  First up:

NGC 2354: An open cluster in Canis Major, which was a large rich round cluster with a pretty curved main stream delineated by a N-S lack of stars.  10 bright stars and numerous, easily 100, faint stars.   This picture shows a view similar to the low power 4-inch's field, with night vision -- the cluster is just right of center.

ESO 428-29: A small, bright elliptical galaxy close to Eta CMi.  Picked up easily in the 4-inch.

After checking out M46 & M47:

Cluster of open clusters, within the same field in the 4-inch: 
Ru 151: Fairly large, round and faint cluster, well separated, fairly rich with faint stars, with a bright star dominating the center
NGC 2428: Tight group of several bright stars in the middle of a large, round cluster, well defined, backed by another 50 or so fainter stars.
NGC 2430: fainter and smaller than the other two, still well seen and fairly well separated from the rich Milky Way field, it is fairly concentrated and probably 30-40 stars.

I tried once more for the Procyon Nebula.  Knowing it was to the east of Procyon, I held the bright star out of the field and used both 4- and 8-inch and flipped through my filters.  I consistently saw a patchy contrast change from the background sky in the 7nm & 3nm Ha filters, vaguely fan shaped and extending roughly 1-degree from Procyon.  But when I pan around the area, I notice other wispy patches of contrast change, which I believe are part of the Orion-Eridanus Super Bubble.  So I am not really sure if I saw it -- since the nebula is depicted in Finkbeiner as being quite bright.  I contacted Kevin Jardine, who runs the Galaxy Map site, and he said not to read too much into Finkbeiner's low-resolution composite.  There are several other bright stars which have nebula showing up around them, so I'm not sure how to understand this: is it sensor artifacts, or a very localized ionization of hydrogen and not an HII region per se?  

I skipped a lot of objects because they were too small to be enjoyed with my scopes.  I really must do something about the image scale, or get a large aperture dob for dark sky outings.  I did, however, return to some of the nebula I had observed at 1x the week before for a closer look:

RCW 19 = Gum 10, & RCW 20: Finally, a nebula I could explore with more certainty!  This was pretty bright and showed well in the 3nm filter in both the 4-inch and especially the 8-inch.  There is a bright and nearly round patch at the NE end of this long nebula, which in the 8-inch reveals two dark nebula / elephant trunk structures intruding into it from the north.  These were still small scale, but very clear.  The rest of the nebula trailed off to the SE and was generally diffuse and heavily mottled, though the nebula expanded again into a large puffy cloud at the SE end (RCW 20).  Galaxy Map says RCW 19 "is part of a 200 thousand solar mass giant molecular cloud related to the Pup OB3 association and the O7f III giant star HD 69464. This image shows only the bright rim of the larger RCW 19 complex.  Avedisova adds the O9.5 III giant CD -35 4412 as a second ionizing star. She places RCW 19 in the star formation region SFR 253.75-0.50 with the molecular cloud [MAB97] 253.63+0.00 (this may be the cloud mentioned above) and the reflection nebulae Bran 124b, Bran 125b and VdBH 9.

NGC 2467: This very exiting nebula immediately impressed with its two large butterfly-like wings.  The bright concentration is the NGC itself, a round bright nebula centered over a star (Haffner 19 a compact cluster containing a Strömgren sphere which is ionized by a hot B0 V-type star).  From there a bright thick fountain of nebula forms one wing, and a brittle dark lane separated it from the other wing sprouts from a bright knot (Haffner 18, which contains a very young star, FM3060a, that has just come into existence and still surrounded by its birth cocoon of gas).  The rest of this wind is fainter, more diffuse and with a dark nebula running the main length, but larger, especially the top of the wing which trails off quite a distance and tapers.


RCW 27: A fine nebula in the large, loose open cluster Ru64, which consists of 10 brighter and countless fainter stars over a 1-degree area.  With Ha, the nebula is larger than the OC, overall round, thick doughnut shaped with crenellated edges, with a brighter quadrant to the SE.  It appears to be shot through with finger-like dark nebula, especially separating the SE and eastern segments (dark nebula SL 1).  It is very reminiscent of the Rosette nebula, but smaller and fainter.  The bluish, non-stellar glow in the lower right of this astro-photo is the reflection nebula NGC 2626.  I did not notice it in NV (which doesn't do well with reflection nebula with blue wavelengths generally).  Galaxy Map notes "RCW 27 lies in the same direction as the reflection nebula association Puppis R2 in the Vela molecular ridge. A major contributor to the ionization of RCW 27 comes from the O star HD 73882. (SIMBAD gives an O9 III class for this star.) The reflection nebula NGC 2626 is part of the same complex."

Gum 15 & Gum 17: Gum 15 is smaller than RCW 27, but brighter.  It is a mostly round puff centered on a bright star, heavily mottled with dark nebula, and with some viewing appears like a cave lit within by a fire -- the bright star clearing gas and dust from around itself.  It looks like a smaller version of the Trifid Nebula.  There are faint nebulous streams wafting faintly from Gum 15 to the NE.  Wikipedia says "located in the constellation of Vela, Gum 15 is about 3,000 light-years from Earth.  It is shaped by aggressive winds flowing from the stars within and around it. The bright star in the center of the nebula is HD 74804, a double star."

To the SE is Gum 17, more than 2x larger but more diffuse and fainter.  It is also round and mottled, with very faint dark nebula crackling through it.  


NGC 2658: Open cluster in Pyxis, it is small, round, rather faint and slightly difficult to separate from it surroundings, moderately rich. 

I moved on to view galaxies.  I used the 685nm filter the most, and sometimes unfiltered.  I took a tour of the Virgo Cluster, and of course found that NV at the relatively small aperture 8-inch, would show me galaxies just fine (as well as I remember my 20-inch in dark sky showed visually), but they are on a small image scale and not easy to appreciate.  I did change my afocal set-up from 67mm to 40mm, but the smaller exit pupil dimmed the sky so much I lost view of some galaxies.  I tried the Hydra cluster, and I could easily see NGC 3309 and NGC 3311 in a brighter clump between two stars, but the other galaxies were small faint imperfections in the sky darkness: I knew they were galaxies, but they were unsatisfying to look at.  The only way to have more image scale is to use more aperture.  I wish the Challenger scope was easier to use; otherwise, I need to beg others' time to observe on their large dobs or go and buy one for myself.  As it was, I stuck with the brighter, larger objects, knowing it' the most I could get out of the equipment at hand.

One good thing about NV and galaxies is it really helps with edge-on flat galaxies.  In flat galaxies, the dust has blocked blue wavelengths and red predominates, and red is more visible in NV.  I will plan my next spring outing on flat galaxies and globular clusters, and hopefully have a more enjoyable experience.

NGC 2997: Small bright core, diffuse halo, seems slightly inclined -- it's a face-on spiral with strong arms on either side, making it appear inclined to me at low magnification.

IC 2469: Gorgeous, ghostly near edge-on, NE-SW, bright nucleus, fairly bright halo is very long tapers to thin points, is a very rich field.  A faint star is next to the nucleus on the SW side.

A trio of flat galaxies, in a line NE-SW, about equally spaced from each other, look in the field like three tossed coins.  NGC 4216: The largest of the three, in the center of them, it has a bright core, well elongated and thin edge on, NNE-SSW, mottled along the edge especially to the NNE side.  To its SW is NGC 4206, very faint, emerges from the dark, about half the size of NGC 4216, it stands nearly N-S and has a bright nucleus and thin tapering tips.  NGC 4222 is to the NE, the smallest of the three, faint, very elongated NE-SW, close to a fairly bright star to its east.  Really beautiful scene with these three flat galaxies.

NGC 3109: Difficult large faint flat galaxy, very long, 4:1 NE-SW, weak core, it seems to melt into the background.

NGC 3087: Small elliptical with a bright core in a triangle of similar magnitude stars

M61: Bright core, round and diffuse halo which is cut off sharply along the SE side.  Did not notice spiral arms.


M58: fairly large round halo and bright core.  NGC 4567 and NGC 4568, both inclined, elongated galaxies, of similar brightness and size, nearly touch the outer edge of their halos, form an arrow shape.  Very small round non-stellar glow nearby is NGC 4564.


NGC 4927: Elongated, pretty bright, small.  Nearby in a 90-degree difference in position angle is NGC 4536, smaller and fainter (I didn't notice the round halo of this face-on spiral).

NGC 4037: Nice, elongated galaxy, bright nucleus, diffuse 3:1 halo N-S.

M83: Bright nucleus, comparatively large round halo with some hints of spiral structure on the NW side.  I think this would look better with even moderate aperture with glass.

NGC 5102, Iota (Centauri)'s Ghost: A slightly elongated elliptical with fairly bright core near the very bright star.

Omega Centauri filled the 8-inch's 2-degree field, and looked pretty good despite some haze which had built up on the low horizon.  

I tried pretty hard to see ESO 270-17, Fourcade-Figuerora Object, but could not.  It's a galaxy "shred," the remnants of a galaxy which merged with Centaurus A and appears similar to a flat galaxy.  I could see Centaurus A, and its distinctive dark lane, just fine.

I then switched to visual (!) observing.  Using the 8-inch, I found

Abell 35: Weak partial C-shaped glow, with OIII.  Of course what I saw was only the brightest, thickest portion of the nebula.  

NGC 4517: Beautiful, very long flat galaxy, ENE-WSW, very subtly mottled halo, bright nucleus.  A star, brighter than the nucleus, touches the northern edge of the halo.  



NGC 4565: "The Needle": Gorgeous flat galaxy running most of the field SE-NW, clear dark lane splitting the mottled halo which tapers to sharp tips, bright round nucleus. 


Saturday, April 6, 2024

weekday dark sky

Tuesday the 2nd seemed the best chance for a dark sky this new moon, so I took it.  I needed to get a lot of work done during the day and take calls during the drive down, but I was able to fit it in ok, and get back the next morning to resume work with only a couple hours sleep.

I went to "Tranquility Base" in the central coast range.  The usual route was closed, so I followed the longer dirt road.  I noticed a couple cars heading out as I was heading in.  One person drove past around midnight, likely a hunter as his dogs were barking and yelping in the back of the pickup truck -- but otherwise I had the place to myself.  Seeing was poor in the beginning of the night but improved.  It was dark -- 21.3 by astronomical twighlight, and a peak of 21.55 around 1am -- as I found the next morning driving home, a thick fog covered the Salinas valley.  

I brought my NP101 and C8, and it was a rather difficult night.  I have trouble balancing that set-up, and if I want to observe an object with the 4-inch, I have to move the NV set-up to the other scope and rebalance.  It wastes a lot of time.  So in spite of the NP101's optical superiority, I think I need to live with the combo bent refractor.  I need to do a close collimation of both objectives in that scope before bringing it out.  

I tried for various new objects and observed some galaxies with the C8.

Comet 12/P Pons-Brooks was somewhere below Jupiter, which was setting fast, so I searched for it with the 4-inch but didn't notice it.  I used NV 1x and saw what I thought was a hazy area, so I pointed the scope to it and saw a bright coma with a stumpy tail pointed east, which hinted of more flowing beyond the field of view but it was very tenuous. 

Next I tried for the Procyon Nebula, but I forgot that it's rather small scale.  Using NV at 1x and 3x with Ha, I did notice a very extremely faint, mottled greyscale change primarily to the south/south-east of the main stars of Canis Minor.  This turns out to be the outer remnants of the Orion-Eradinus Super Bubble, which is a pretty cool observation by itself, but not what I was going for.  I need to try again.



The nearby Seagull Nebula was quite beautiful, and appeared as a bubble with wisps and puffs completing the arcs started by the "wings"

Next I tried some supernova remnants which were the subject of a recent paper.  These were so difficult with NV I doubt they are visual objects:

G209.9-8.2, 4-inch and Ha+OIII dual band: Appeared as a very extremely faint eyebrow of nebula to the NE of two "closer" stars.  to the south of these stars I saw a long, curved glow, heading south then east, but it quickly petered out when it curved east.  I noticed a flow of nebula passing diagonally through the view NE to SW, which seem to be the wider, fainter extensions of the nebula.  

G181.3+12.1, 4-inch and Ha+OIII, it is a new supernova remnant.  All I saw was a very extremely faint curved north rim, though there seemed a milky haze where the "inside" of the circle the arc, extended, would form.  The structure is 9-degrees in diameter and could perhaps be tried with 3x, but very doubtful.  I tried to follow the arc around its shape, but quickly lost the rim to the sky background.  I did not see G181.1+9.5, which is much smaller and on the inner eastern edge of G181.3+12.1.

Next was a series of galaxies using the C8 with NV, mostly unfiltered.  M51 was really spectacular, showing clear spiral structure with three arms, mottling, and a haze around it.  I wished to be able to magnify the view more easily (rather than unscrewing the NV).  I would have added a Powermate but the extra weight would force me to pause and try to rebalance the scopes.  NV certainly showed M51 better than my 20-inch in a dark sky, as I remember it, but the view feels not clean.  The cores of the galaxies were much brightened and bloated (as NV tends to do with bright objects).  It is like this for most galaxies -- and I miss seeing a "stellar" core which actually looks like a star.

I wasn't taking notes, just cruising around.  I moved over to Markarian's Chain and thought to do an experiment.  Using NV I was able to very clearly see both NGC 4388 and NGC 4402, two nearly edge-on galaxies which bracket M84 and M86.  Switching to glass, I could only see NGC 4388 with some difficulty (brightening averted vision) but I could not see NGC 4402.  I was using only a 22mm Nagler, so low magnification, and I might've seen it with higher magnification.  But it just points to that NV can show you more galaxies, but perhaps not as aesthetically as one would wish, and certainly not allow easy study of them for lack of image scale.

I will say NV does a very good job with faint edge-on galaxies, making them clearly visible, but again at small image scale.  NGC 4517 was very bright, it's bright core off-centered in the mottled long halo.  There were others I noticed but didn't make note of.  

I spent a fair amount of time on the Gum Nebula, which had risen fairly high.  Here is an Aladin Finkbeiner layer representation of what I saw, annotated with the major designations.  Also attached is my rough field sketch.  The "cometary" nebula is Sh2-311, and it was quite bright.  The "SC w/N" or star cluster with nebula, is RCW 19 -- in which I noticed a grouping of brighter stars which seemed like an open cluster, but I don't find a designation for one -- though large and loose NGC 2546 is nearby, and I may have thought they were together.  It would be better next time to explore this more closely with the 4- and 8-inch to capture more of the smaller structures.


Toward 1am I repeated my observation of the Spica Nebula, using 1x and 3nm Ha.  It's very satisfying to be able to have this "as my own" -- I very much doubt anyone else has seen it.

I need to do a better job planning my sessions, as I didn't remain focused.  I wandered around a bit -- Omega Centauri had risen but it was behind a tree -- it was fun to watch stars blink on and off as it moved through the sky.  Later, I watched the North America Nebula rise over a rocky ridgeline.

Sunday, March 31, 2024

15 march 2024

It's been clear but windy, including the jet stream raging overhead.  Seeing was variable, with higher elevations a bit better than lower.  I spent time on the 6-inch going after Struves in Leo and Ursa Major.  After logging a fair amount, I switched over to the Burnham list, especially the lower catalog numbers which he discovered with his 6-inch f/15 -- it's fun to challenge myself against him.  And, they stand more chance of being binary as they are generally more closely split.  Honestly, much of the Struve catalog is hardly worth the slewing, as nearly anything >5" turns out to be not binary.  I wonder why he even took a measure.  It's misleading to be impressed by the number of "discoveries" of the early visual observers, since they seem to have measured anything which struck their fancy, and got credit for a "discovery."  Granted they didn't have satellite parallax data to check against, but they really should have known better. 

STF1306 AB: 152; 125x: Lovely light yellow A and orange B, closely split with low power, 2 delta mag.  -36% PRO, and in spite of only 81 AU WS, 1.5+0.6 Msol, it might not be binary.  And in spite of the SOC grade 4 orbit, too, which predicts a 920-year period. 
09h 10m 23.53s +67° 08' 03.3" P.A. 346.00 sep 4.4 mag 4.87,8.85 Sp F7V dist. 20.38 pc (66.48 l.y.)
STF1312 AB: 152; 125x: Lovely half delta magnitude white pair, well split.  23% PRO, 1,910 AU WS, 2.9+2.5 Msol, and the RVD 0.7 < EV 2.2, it is possibly binary and needs an orbit.
09h 10m 18.19s +52° 23' 05.7" P.A. 147.00 sep 4.7 mag 8.35,8.80 Sp F2V dist. 952.38 pc (3106.66 l.y.)

STF1313 AB: 152; 200x: Excellent close pair, faint, white, slightly unequal, split with seeing.  At the base of a 4 star L-shaped asterism.  -82% PRO, it is not binary.
09h 13m 45.13s +69° 58' 47.4" P.A. 283.00 sep 1.1 mag 9.39,9.55 Sp G5 dist. 364.96 pc (1190.5 l.y.)

STF1314 AB: 152; 125x: Faint, superwide.  -93% PRO, it is not binary.
09h 12m 39.51s +61° 56' 28.8" P.A. 86.00 sep 47.9 mag 8.86,11.69 Sp F8 dist. 89.21 pc (291 l.y.)

STF1315 AB: 152; 125x: Near equal white stars, wide.  Also seen in the 60mm at low power.  70% PRO, 3,841 AU WS, 2.2+2.0 Msol, and the RVD 0.3 < EV 1.4, it is possibly binary and needs an orbit.
09h 12m 45.94s +61° 40' 32.7" P.A. 28.00 sep 25.1 mag 7.33,7.65 Sp A3IV dist. 100.2 pc (326.85 l.y.)

STF1318 AB: 152; 150x: Close split, nearly 1 Dm, white.  Split with low power but best at 150x.  -52% PRO, 131 AU WS, 1.2+0.9 Msol, it is possibly binary and needs an orbit.
09h 13m 38.79s +46° 59' 25.3" P.A. 227.00 sep 2.6 mag 7.85,9.51 Sp F8V dist. 52.44 pc (171.06 l.y.)

STF1321 AB: 152; 125x: Yellow-white near equal wide pair, well seen in the 60mm with low power.  77% PRO, 110 AU WS, 0.5+0.5 Msol, RVD 0.1 < EV 3.9, it is certainly binary and has a SOC grade 4 orbit 1986-year period.  
09h 14m 22.79s +52° 41' 11.8" P.A. 99.00 sep 16.9 mag 7.79,7.88 Sp K7V+M0V dist. 5.81 pc (18.95 l.y.)
STF1330 AB: 152; 125x: Superwide, faint, near equal.  49% PRO, 3,096 AU WS, 1.3+0.8 Msol, but RVD 1.8 > EV 1.1.  It is not binary.
09h 22m 14.58s +67° 10' 51.3" P.A. 303.00 sep 25.2 mag 9.37,11.52 Sp G

STF1331 AB: 152; 200x: Barest of hairline splits with seeing, near equal, high power only.  64% PRO, 221 AU WS, 2.1+2.0 Msol, it is likely binary and needs an orbit.
09h 20m 46.02s +61° 20' 58.4" P.A. 153.00 sep 0.9 mag 8.54,8.74 Sp A8IV dist. 206.61 pc (673.96 l.y.)

STF1340 AB: 152; 125x: 1 Dm, white, wide.  80% PRO, 1,288 AU WS, 2.7+1.7 Msol, it is possibly binary and needs an orbit.
09h 22m 32.22s +49° 32' 41.4" P.A. 319.00 sep 6.3 mag 7.08,8.99 Sp B9.5V dist. 226.24 pc (737.99 l.y.)

STF1341 AB: 152; 125x: Superwide, faint.  78% PRO, 1,358 AU WS, 1.0+1.0 Msol, RVD 0.1 < EV 1.6, it is probably binary and needs an orbit.
09h 22m 37.58s +50° 36' 13.5" P.A. 89.00 sep 20.5 mag 9.09,9.17 Sp G5+G5 dist. 177.62 pc (579.4 l.y.)

STF1345 AB: 152; 150x: Very fine 1 Dm pair, well split.  66% PRO, 660 AU WS, 1.9+1.5 Msol, it is probably binary and needs an orbit.
09h 26m 57.20s +64° 20' 35.7" P.A. 85.00 sep 2.9 mag 8.84,10.27 Sp A2 dist. 289.86 pc (945.52 l.y.)

STF1346 AB: 152; 125x: 1 Dm, white, well split.  -36% PRO, it is not binary.  
09h 25m 37.88s +54° 00' 57.5" P.A. 315.00 sep 5.8 mag 7.69,8.59 Sp A2V dist. 196.08 pc (639.61 l.y.)

STF1349 AB: 152; 125x: Equal, wide.  4% PRO with 2% error, 4,701 AU WS, 2.7+2.0 Msol, RVD 1.0+1.3 Msol.  It is boarderline possibly binary, an orbit should be tried.
09h 31m 09.89s +67° 32' 28.4" P.A. 166.00 sep 19.2 mag 7.54,8.98 Sp A3V dist. 549.45 pc (1792.31 l.y.)

STF1350 AB: 152; 125x: Equal, wide.  28% PRO, 1,939 AU WS, 2.0+2.0 Msol, it is possibly binary and needs an orbit.
09h 34m 19.56s +66° 47' 42.3" P.A. 249.00 sep 10.2 mag 8.26,8.31 Sp F4V+F6V dist. 225.73 pc (736.33 l.y.)

STF1351 AB: 152; 125x: Very bright yellow-white A and 4 Dm, well split B.  44% PRO, 539 AU WS, 2.1+0.6 Msol, but RVD 4.6 > EV 3.0, it is not likely binary.
09h 31m 31.57s +63° 03' 42.5" P.A. 267.00 sep 22.7 mag 3.65,9.19 Sp F0IV+K5V dist. 23.82 pc (77.7 l.y.)

STF1352 AB: 152; 125x: Very wide, faint, unequal.  98% PRO, it is not binary.
09h 29m 12.10s +43° 17' 39.9" P.A. 353.00 sep 21.7 mag 10.57,11.60 Sp G0

STF1358 AB: 152; 125x: 1 Dm, wide.  -93% PRO, it is not binary.
09h 30m 56.58s +44° 41' 02.1" P.A. 176.00 sep 24.1 mag 7.93,9.25 Sp M dist. 621.12 pc (2026.09 l.y.)

STF1359 AB: 152; 125x: 1 Dm, well split.  -78% PRO, it is not binary.
09h 32m 58.20s +56° 14' 59.1" P.A. 54.00 sep 7.5 mag 9.77,10.76 Sp G5

STF1360 AB: 152; 125x: Near equal, wide. 38% PRO, 492 AU WS, 0.8+0.8 Msol, and the RVD 0.1 < EV 2.4, it is likely binary and needs an orbit.
09h 30m 35.95s +10° 36' 06.4" P.A. 242.00 sep 13.8 mag 8.95,8.86 Sp G5 dist. 29.64 pc (96.69 l.y.)

STF1363 AB: 152; 125x: Faint, wide.  1% PRO, 880 AU WS, 1.6+0.8 Msol, but RVD 2.9 > EV 2.2, it is not binary.
09h 35m 14.09s +60° 53' 30.5" P.A. 356.00 sep 10.8 mag 7.32,10.62 Sp F0 dist. 75.64 pc (246.74 l.y.)

STF1364 AB: 152; 125x: Wide, 1 Dm, light orange stars.  15% PRO, 1,895 AU WS, 1.5+1.1 Msol, RVD 1.1 < EV 1.6, it is possibly binary and needs an orbit.
09h 32m 01.52s +20° 02' 49.3" P.A. 155.00 sep 16.2 mag 8.59,9.74 Sp F5 dist. 102.99 pc (335.95 l.y.)

STF1366 AB: 152; 125x: Faint, well split, more than 1 Dm.  94% PRO, 847 AU WS, 1.4+1.0 Msol, and RVD 1.5 < EV 2.2, it is possibly binary and needs an orbit.  
09h 35m 42.47s +53° 17' 40.4" P.A. 321.00 sep 7.8 mag 8.44,10.09 Sp F2 dist. 95.51 pc (311.55 l.y.)

STF1368 AB: 152; 125x: Faint, 1 Dm, superwide.  -21% PRO, it is not binary.
09h 36m 04.95s +53° 17' 53.9" P.A. 220.00 sep 21.9 mag 8.79,10.45 Sp F5 dist. 142.25 pc (464.02 l.y.)

STF1376 AB: 152; 125x: Near equal white stars, well split.  No parallax data for the primary.
09h 45m 01.10s +43° 13' 39.8" P.A. 309.00 sep 5.4 mag 9.07,9.05 Sp F5V dist. 130.38 pc (425.3 l.y.)

STF1379 AB: 152; 125x: Faint wide pair.  91% PRO, 596 AU WS, 1.5+0.7 Msol, but the RVD 3.0 > EV 2.5, it is not binary.
09h 45m 16.74s +08° 52' 58.0" P.A. 175.00 sep 9.8 mag 7.16,10.75 Sp F5 dist. 63.49 pc (207.1 l.y.)

STF1381 AB: 152; 200x: Very closely split with seeing, high power.  1% PRO, 134 AU WS, 1.5+1.6 Msol, is is not likely binary, though there is a SOC grade 5 orbit, 1787-year period.
09h 51m 15.22s +60° 37' 00.1" P.A. 187.00 sep 0.8 mag 8.93,9.20 Sp G0 dist. 190.11 pc (620.14 l.y.)

STF1383 AB: 152; 125x: Very faint B, wide.  -25% PRO, it is not binary. 
09h 50m 45.33s +31° 37' 50.4" P.A. 227.00 sep 22.8 mag 9.95,12.10 Sp G5

STF1384 AB: 152; 125x: Faint pair, unequal, wide.  83% PRO, 1,361 AU WS, 1.1+1.0 Msol, RVD 0.5 < EV 1.7, it is likely binary and needs an orbit.
09h 49m 56.91s +16° 19' 55.8" P.A. 183.00 sep 11.6 mag 9.76,10.02 Sp G0

STF1386 AB: 152; 150x: Difficult, with seeing, faint, close split equal pair.  -56% PRO, it is not binary.
09h 55m 04.02s +68° 54' 06.1" P.A. 111.00 sep 2.1 mag 9.30,9.34 Sp F5 dist. 168.92 pc (551.02 l.y.)

STF1387 CD: 152; 125x: In same system as STF1386, This is a faint near equal well split pair.  31% PRO, 932 AU WS, 0.9+0.9 Msol, RVD 0.1 < EV 1.8, it is likely binary and needs an orbit.  Interesting because this is closer to us it appears wider than STF1386, but it is probably binary whereas STF1386 is not.
09h 55m 02.78s +68° 56' 22.5" P.A. 273.00 sep 8.9 mag 10.73,10.67 Sp G dist. 76.75 pc (250.36 l.y.)

STF1388 AB: 152; 125x: Faint, very wide.  -38% PRO, it is not binary.
09h 52m 22.11s +28° 33' 58.4" P.A. 122.00 sep 33.4 mag 9.46,11.47 Sp F2

STF1389 AB: 152; 150x: Near equal light orange stars, close split, best seen medium power.  29% PRO, 133 AU WS, 0.8+0.9 Msol, RVD 0.3 < EV 4.8, it is likely binary.  SOC grade 4 orbit 1454-year period. 
09h 52m 26.17s +26° 58' 53.8" P.A. 290.00 sep 2.4 mag 9.12,9.50 Sp K0 dist. 57.54 pc (187.7 l.y.)
STF1390 AB: 152; 200x: 1 Dm, closely split.  41% PRO, 968 AU WS, 2.4+2.0, it is likely binary and needs an orbit.
09h 52m 08.54s +16° 27' 46.8" P.A. 207.00 sep 2.2 mag 9.31,10.12 Sp B9 dist. 366.3 pc (1194.87 l.y.)

STF1391 AB: 152; 125x: Unequal white stars, close split, it's part of equal triangle asterism of similar magnitude stars.  85% PRO, 2,769 AU WS, 1.7+1.1 Msol, RVD 1.6 > EV 1.3, it is boarderline binary and an orbit should be tried.
09h 55m 57.22s +51° 11' 27.2" P.A. 316.00 sep 13.4 mag 9.10,10.94 Sp F5

STF1392 AB: 152; 125x: Very faint B, 2 Dm, wide.  4% PRO, 2,836 AU WS, 1.7+1.2 Msol, RVD 1.9 > EV 1.3, it is not binary.
09h 56m 03.71s +29° 05' 54.8" P.A. 176.00 sep 9.4 mag 9.93,12.60 Sp G5

STF1394 AB: 152; 125x: 1 Dm, well split. 76% PRO, 318 AU WS, 1.1+0.9 Msol, RVD 0.7 < EV 3.3, it is likely binary and has a SOC grade 5 orbit 2848-year period.
09h 57m 14.57s +45° 54' 10.1" P.A. 250.00 sep 4.5 mag 8.89,9.75 Sp G0 dist. 58.11 pc (189.55 l.y.)
STF1395 AB: 152; 125x: Faint B 3 Dm, superwide.  41% PRO, 2,919 AU WS, 2.0+1.1 Msol, but RVD 3.0 > EV 1.4, it is not binary. 
09h 55m 23.11s +10° 06' 42.5" P.A. 229.00 sep 18.8 mag 8.21,10.54 Sp G5 dist. 41.49 pc (135.34 l.y.)

STF1397 AB: 152; 200x: Very tough this aperture, tiny faint B a very close split with seeing.  No parallax data for the secondary.  
09h 56m 44.80s +25° 03' 14.1" P.A. 96.00 sep 1.1 mag 9.33,10.62 Sp G0 dist. 263.16 pc (858.43 l.y.)

STF1399 AB: 152; 125x: Superwide, 1 Dm.  -2% PRO, 1,249 AU WS, 1.1+0.9 Msol, RVD 0.2 < EV 1.7, it is boarderline binary, an orbit should be tried.
09h 57m 02.21s +19° 45' 44.6" P.A. 176.00 sep 30.2 mag 7.65,8.36 Sp G0 dist. 41.77 pc (136.25 l.y.)

BU   26 AB: 152; 200x: Very distinct B seen with foveal coaxing, can then hold steady direct vision, well separated.  -77% PRO, it is not binary.
11h 23m 46.46s -10° 25' 22.1" P.A. 68.00 sep 3.0 mag 7.76,10.06 Sp K0

BU  456 AB: 152; 150x: Excellent near equal pair, hairline split.  200x further separates the stars, but seeing disturbs the image.  15% PRO, 53 AU WS, 0.8+0.8 Msol, it is possibly binary and needs an orbit.
11h 36m 49.86s -12° 21' 02.7" P.A. 162.00 sep 1.2 mag 9.56,9.73 Sp G5 dist. 48.19 pc (157.2 l.y.)

BU  458 AB: 152; 125x: Wide 1 Dm.  -47% PRO, it is not binary.
12h 04m 17.11s -21° 02' 21.0" P.A. 236.00 sep 30.1 mag 7.87,9.97 Sp A2II dist. 384.62 pc (1254.63 l.y.)

BU  589 AB: 152; 125x: B seen with foveal coaxing only, rather well separated.  11% PRO, 488 AU WS, 2.0+0.8 Msol, it is possibly binary and needs an orbit.
09h 26m 35.56s +06° 31' 49.5" P.A. 219.00 sep 3.1 mag 8.00,12.90 Sp F5 dist. 190.11 pc (620.14 l.y.)

BU  596 AB: 152; 250x: Extremely faint B star emerges with foveal coaxing and with seeing, closely split. 2% PRO, 540 AU WS, 2.7+0.9 Msol, it is possibly binary and an orbit should be tried.
10h 49m 26.81s +17° 08' 47.2" P.A. 276.00 sep 2.8 mag 7.20,13.70 Sp K0 dist. 230.41 pc (751.6 l.y.)

BU  598 AB: 152; 125x: B not seen, too faint.  -78% PRO, it is not binary.
11h 00m 44.83s +06° 06' 05.4" P.A. 219.00 sep 40.3 mag 4.99,12.60 Sp A5III dist. 46.36 pc (151.23 l.y.)

BU  600 AB: 152; 200x: I see a mere suggestion of a faint star, hazy, a dim brightening dim about 2" from the bright primary.  No parallax data for the secondary.  
11h 16m 58.18s -07° 08' 04.9" P.A. 211.00 sep 1.3 mag 6.15,10.50 Sp A8IVp dist. 129.53 pc (422.53 l.y.)

Thursday, March 7, 2024

24 february 2024

A clear night but with average seeing and a steady marine haze, so I used the 6-inch.  It took a while to star align, which was frustrating, but eventually settled in for a decent night.  Ended with views of the just-past full moon, with plenty of interesting crates and mountains on the moon.  

STF 834 AB: 152; 125x: Very wide near equal.  -23% PRO, it is not binary.
06h 04m 34.24s +30° 14' 04.0" P.A. 310.00 sep 22.8 mag 8.61,9.38 Sp A dist. 25.52 pc (83.25 l.y.)

STF 845 AB: 152; 125x: Wide, 2 Dm, light orange stars.  19% PRO, 705 AU WS, 2.2+1.9 Msol, RVD 0.7 < EV 3.2, it is probably binary and an orbit should be tried.
06h 11m 36.59s +48° 42' 39.6" P.A. 358.00 sep 7.5 mag 6.16,6.86 Sp A1V+A6V dist. 102.46 pc (334.22 l.y.)

STF 862 AB: 152; 125x: Faint B seen with averted vision only well split. -45% PRO, it is not binary.
06h 12m 05.49s +29° 29' 31.7" P.A. 338.00 sep 6.9 mag 7.55,10.84 Sp G2Ib dist. 564.97 pc (1842.93 l.y.)

STF 865 AB: 152; 125x: Extremely faint, fairly close, seen best with averted vision.  97% PRO, 1,956 AU WS, 2.8+1.6 Msol, but the RVD 2.2 > EV 2.0.  An orbit should be tried if only to check the marginal results.
06h 14m 22.32s +51° 09' 59.3" P.A. 69.00 sep 5.2 mag 8.12,10.26 Sp B8 dist. 392.16 pc (1279.23 l.y.)

STF 872 AB: 152; 125x: Unequal pair, well split.  31% PRO, 872 AU WS, 1.8+1.5 Msol, it is possibly binary and needs an orbit.
06h 15m 39.06s +36° 08' 55.3" P.A. 216.00 sep 11.4 mag 6.89,7.38 Sp F4IV dist. 82.03 pc (267.58 l.y.)

STF 876 AB: 152; 125x: Faint B seen averted vision only, 2 Dm, wide.  -69% PRO, it is not binary.
06h 18m 30.80s +53° 39' 29.0" P.A. 41.00 sep 8.7 mag 9.23,11.80 Sp A5

STF 879 AB: 152; 125x: Extremely faint, seen with averted vision only, wide.  33% PRO, 1,819 AU WS, 1.5+1.1 Msol, it is possibly binary and needs an orbit.
06h 16m 18.79s +30° 04' 34.2" P.A. 70.00 sep 7.7 mag 10.10,11.40

STF 883 AB: 152; 200x: In a number five dice-face asterism, one of the corners.  Need averted vision to pull out the B star, close split even with 200x.  76% PRO, 765 AU WS, 1.7+1.6 Msol, it is likely binary and needs an orbit.
06h 19m 08.03s +39° 46' 28.7" P.A. 265.00 sep 3.5 mag 9.27,9.70 Sp F0

STF 884 AB: 152; 125x: Near equal, well split.  50% PRO, 4,484 AU WS, 2.9+2.7 Msol, it is possibly binary and an orbit should be tried.
06h 20m 33.58s +47° 07' 13.0" P.A. 272.00 sep 8.9 mag 8.68,8.94 Sp A0 dist. 507.61 pc (1655.82 l.y.)

STF 888 AB-C: 152; 125x: Close, 2 Dm.  No parallax data for the primary.
06h 19m 58.96s +28° 25' 36.6" P.A. 265.00 sep 2.9 mag 7.46,9.63 Sp A6V dist. 132.98 pc (433.78 l.y.)

STF 890 AB: 152; 125x:  B is very wide, and with averted vision only.  -76% PRO, it is not binary.
06h 21m 40.95s +36° 06' 47.0" P.A. 271.00 sep 17.8 mag 9.71,12.35 Sp A0

STF 896 AB: 152; 125x: B seen with averted vision only.  -96% PRO, it is not binary.
06h 25m 52.92s +51° 52' 31.0" P.A. 81.00 sep 18.2 mag 9.17,9.64 Sp A5

STF 902 AB: 152; 125x: Wide, very faint.  -92% PRO, it is not binary.
06h 27m 30.57s +34° 57' 19.4" P.A. 152.00 sep 11.2 mag 9.65,10.48 Sp F8

STF 903 AB: 152; 125x: Very wide, faint 4 Dm B.  14% PRO, 9,371 AU WS, 4.8+1.8 Msol, it is possibly binary and needs an orbit. 
06h 24m 20.58s -12° 57' 43.0" P.A. 295.00 sep 23.1 mag 6.12,10.49 Sp B5Ve dist. 289.02 pc (942.78 l.y.)

STF 904 AB: 152; 125x: Near equal, faint, well separated.  26% PRO, 1,523 AU WS, 1.6+1.4 Msol, and the RVD 0.5 < EV 1.9, it is likely binary and needs an orbit.
06h 30m 12.03s +51° 46' 58.8" P.A. 165.00 sep 4.9 mag 10.30,11.21 Sp F0

STF 905 AB: 152; 200x: Faint B just seen direct, very closely split. -65% PRO, it is not binary.
06h 28m 53.76s +40° 07' 11.1" P.A. 130.00 sep 1.7 mag 8.21,9.95 Sp A1IV

STF 906 AB: 152; 125x: Close, 1 Dm, averted vision needed to bring out B.  82% PRO, 805 AU WS, 1.3+1.1 Msol, it is likely binary and needs an orbit tried.
06h 28m 44.86s +37° 22' 50.6" P.A. 337.00 sep 6.5 mag 9.14,10.13 Sp F5

STF 907 AB: 152; 125x: 1 Dm faint pair, well separated.  20% PRO, 2.9+2.1 Msol, and the RVD 1.2 > EV 1.1, but only a little.  It is possibly binary and an orbit should be tried.
06h 28m 09.96s +30° 25' 12.2" P.A. 302.00 sep 11.9 mag 9.40,10.38 Sp A0V

STF 908 AB: 152; 125x: Wide, faint, near equal.  -27% PRO, it is not binary.
06h 31m 16.69s +53° 50' 52.4" P.A. 358.00 sep 8.6 mag 10.71,10.70

STF 909 AB: 152; 125x: Wide, faint.  -96% PRO, it is not binary.
06h 28m 43.55s +35° 15' 42.9" P.A. 76.00 sep 15.5 mag 8.50,11.10 Sp F8 dist. 6666.67 pc (21746.68 l.y.)

STF 912 AB: 152; 200x: Faint, very closely split.  43% PRO, 1,037 AU WS, 2.3+1.5 Msol, it is likely binary and needs an orbit.
06h 29m 46.47s +36° 36' 11.4" P.A. 28.00 sep 3.4 mag 8.76,10.90 Sp A0 dist. 420.17 pc (1370.59 l.y.)

STF 917 AB: 152; 125x: Superwide, very faint.  54% PRO, 2,526 AU WS, 1.0+0.7 Msol, but the RVD 1.6 > EV 1.1, it is not binary.
06h 33m 29.89s +52° 30' 25.8" P.A. 231.00 sep 27.7 mag 9.61,11.72

STF 918 AB: 152; 125x: Closely separated, 2 Dm.  -59% PRO, it is not binary.
06h 33m 57.62s +52° 27' 41.8" P.A. 336.00 sep 4.8 mag 7.26,8.19 Sp A3 dist. 90.58 pc (295.47 l.y.)

STF 928 AB: 152; 150x: Very close, near equal.  -1% PRO, it is not likely binary.
06h 34m 41.81s +38° 32' 24.5" P.A. 131.00 sep 3.4 mag 7.93,8.61 Sp F5 dist. 189.04 pc (616.65 l.y.)

Friday, March 1, 2024

8 february 2024 Monoceros Struves

Clear day and night, but with merely average transparency and slightly better seeing -- which seemed like a gift after so poor a season.  I observed the sun during the day, with the amazingly complex sunspot near the center of the disc (3576), very elongated and with an incredibly long and thin light bridge stretching along nearly the entire length.  Quite the sight.  Some nice prominences too.  I decided to start observing earlier in the evening, so I had about an hour before going into the house to wish the kids goodnight and take a short break.  Speaking of shorts, I seem to have one on my dew controller, as I burned through three fuses.  Fortunately, there wasn't much dew until the very end of the night, near 11pm, when a high thin haze started to spread across the sky.

STF 703 AB: 152; 125x: Extremely faint B seen averted vision only, wide.  -96% PRO, it is not binary.
06h 13m 08.25s +85° 36' 31.2" P.A. 57.00 sep 51.1 mag 9.19,11.85 Sp K5

STF 832 AB: 152; 125x: Faint B 1 Dm, averted vision only, wide.  Parallax data missing for the primary.
06h 01m 04.98s -14° 31' 22.1" P.A. 88.00 sep 24.7 mag 9.12,10.55 Sp F0V+A2Va

STF 841 AB: 152; 125x: B is very faint, averted vision only, well split.  -95% PRO, it is not binary.
06h 06m 10.75s +06° 28' 32.0" P.A. 15.00 sep 18.0 mag 9.44,12.24 Sp F8

STF 843 AB: 152; 125x: B is wide, very faint, averted vision needed to brighten, 2 Dm.  -92%PRO, it is not binary.
06h 05m 09.68s -14° 18' 34.0" P.A. 13.00 sep 24.0 mag 8.50,11.20 Sp K0III

STF 864 AC 152; 125x: Faint well split B, averted vision needed.  AB is J 1922, slightly unequal around 6" separation.  Lacks parallax data for the primary.
06h 10m 52.84s +20° 36' 33.7" P.A. 58.00 sep 22.1 mag 10.51,11.10 Sp B5+B

STF 869 AB: 152; 125x: Slightly unequal wide pair.  0% PRO, it is not likely binary.
06h 10m 44.34s -09° 51' 08.3" P.A. 280.00 sep 24.5 mag 8.18,9.09 Sp A8V+F8V

STF 870 AB: 152; 125x: Faint, slightly unequal white stars.  -95% PRO, it is not binary.
06h 13m 23.44s +14° 06' 27.1" P.A. 172.00 sep 11.0 mag 9.60,10.60 Sp G5IV

STF 875 AB: 152; 125x: Faint, well split B, just barely visible with direct vision.  -95% PRO, it is not binary.
06h 12m 08.71s -13° 08' 53.3" P.A. 323.00 sep 4.6 mag 9.19,10.38 Sp K0

STF 910 AB: 152; 125x: Super wide, 3 Dm. BC not seen, 0.5" and narrowed since discovery, it might be binary.  Parallax missing for the B companion.  
06h 26m 43.39s +00° 27' 15.2" P.A. 152.00 sep 66.0 mag 6.99,8.11 Sp G5 dist. 207.47 pc (676.77 l.y.)

STF 911 AB: 152; 125x: Near equal, wide.  -93% PRO, it is not binary.
06h 26m 52.75s +04° 04' 10.8" P.A. 155.00 sep 11.7 mag 8.65,9.04 Sp K0

STF 914 AB: 152; 125x: Wide, 2 Dm.  35% PRO, 2,436 AU WS, 2.4+1.3 Msol, but the RVD 2.2 > EV 1.6, it is not binary.
06h 26m 44.85s -07° 30' 43.0" P.A. 299.00 sep 21.1 mag 6.32,9.25 Sp A0Vn dist. 75.41 pc (245.99 l.y.)

STF 915 AB: 152; 125x: Well split, nearly 1 Dm.  A is V648 Mon.  -27% PRO, it is not binary.
06h 28m 13.96s +05° 16' 20.1" P.A. 43.00 sep 5.9 mag 7.60,8.52 Sp A1p dist. 269.54 pc (879.24 l.y.)

STF 919 AB: 60; 90x: Beta Mon. Crooked finger asterism three of near equal stars.  AB is closely but cleanly split.  Parallax data missing for B, but A and C have 77% PRO, 2,092 AU WS, 4.9+4.1 Msol, so if B is of overlapping parallax this would be a complex triple.  Would be good to have an orbit made.
06h 28m 49.07s -07° 01' 59.0" P.A. 133.00 sep 7.2 mag 4.62,5.00 Sp B4V+B2V dist. 207.47 pc (676.77 l.y.)

STF 920 AB: 152; 125x: Bright white A, wide B appears with averted vision, and I can hold it direct with foveal coaxing. 20% PRO, 6,342 AU WS, 4.6+2.3 Msol, it is possibly binary and an orbit should be tried.
06h 30m 29.22s +04° 19' 56.8" P.A. 210.00 sep 9.5 mag 7.35,10.24 Sp B2IV-V dist. 14285.71 pc (46599.99 l.y.)

STF 921 AB: 152; 125x: Wide, 3 Dm, white.  -41% PRO, it is not binary.
06h 31m 09.56s +11° 15' 05.0" P.A. 3.00 sep 16.2 mag 6.12,9.09 Sp B2V:nne dist. 303.03 pc (988.48 l.y.)

STF 926 AB: 152; 125x: Wide, unequal, white.  74% PRO, 2,444 AU WS, 2.7+1.8 Msol, it is possibly binary and an orbit should be tried.
06h 31m 40.54s +05° 46' 08.8" P.A. 287.00 sep 10.8 mag 7.23,8.62 Sp A1p dist. 71.38 pc (232.84 l.y.)

STF 927 AB: 152; 125x: Fairly close, B is faint, need averted vision to notice it.  -14% PRO, it is not likely binary.
06h 32m 07.33s +04° 58' 16.1" P.A. 85.00 sep 5.1 mag 9.16,10.30 Sp A3V

STF 930 AB: 152; 125x: Rich star field, many of which were pointlessly measured, since the parallax don't overlap.  AB is near equal, wide, -27% PRO and not binary.
06h 34m 09.26s +07° 59' 27.3" P.A. 277.00 sep 26.2 mag 8.38,9.87 Sp F8II dist. 223.71 pc (729.74 l.y.)

STF 931 AB: 152; 125x: In same field with STF930, wide 1 Dm.  -80% PRO, it is not binary.
06h 34m 20.10s +07° 59' 06.4" P.A. 23.00 sep 23.8 mag 9.64,10.51 Sp A2

STF 938 AB: 152; 125x: In same field with STF930.  Wide, 3 Dm, B seen with averted vision.  -41% PRO, it is not binary.
06h 34m 46.33s +07° 34' 21.0" P.A. 211.00 sep 11.0 mag 6.45,10.60 Sp A0Vs dist. 115.47 pc (376.66 l.y.)

STF 939 AB: 152; 125x: Very pretty asterism, forms one of an equal triangle of near equal stars.  AB -67% PRO, BC 26% PRO but the WS is 27,981 AU, far too apart to be binary.
06h 35m 55.14s +05° 18' 35.2" P.A. 107.00 sep 30.3 mag 8.39,9.20 Sp B1III dist. 621.12 pc (2026.09 l.y.)

STF 950 AB: 152; 125x: Nice cluster of a dozen near equal stars in a rough triangle asterism.  A bright star in the middle of the asterism has a close 2 Dm companion.  -15% PRO, it is not binary.
06h 40m 58.66s +09° 53' 44.7" P.A. 214.00 sep 3.0 mag 4.66,7.79 Sp O7Ve+B2: dist. 281.69 pc (918.87 l.y.)

STF 951 AB: 152; 125x: In the same field with STF950, wide 2 Dm.  No parallax or proper motion for the secondary. 
06h 40m 38.37s +09° 47' 16.0" P.A. 310.00 sep 21.3 mag 8.49,10.91 Sp B3Vnn

STF 952 MN: 152; 125x: Near equal, wide.  86% PRO, but a very wide 10,414 AU WS, 2.7+2.6 Msol might be enough to bind them, so it should be checked with an orbit.
06h 41m 10.38s +09° 53' 01.7" P.A. 116.00 sep 14.1 mag 9.75,10.05 Sp B9

STF 955 AB: 152; 125x: Near equal, wide.  3% PRO with 3% error, 967 AU WS, 3.5+3.0 Msol, it should be checked with an orbit.
06h 41m 10.25s -07° 59' 26.1" P.A. 268.00 sep 1.2 mag 8.97,9.59 Sp B9

STF 956 AB: 125x: Excellent pair, the delicate close companion seen with low power, and actually disappeared at 150x, very fine and small.  -89% PRO, it is not binary.
06h 42m 40.55s +01° 42' 58.2" P.A. 194.00 sep 6.9 mag 7.96,10.69 Sp O8.5V dist. 1030.93 pc (3362.89 l.y.)

STF 965 AB: 152; 125x: Very lovely close pair, faint B is 1 Dm. There is a wide plus one star (AD), nearly same magnitude as B.  -21% PRO, it is not binary.
06h 47m 16.12s +10° 54' 59.0" P.A. 346.00 sep 6.0 mag 8.92,10.50 Sp G0

STF 967 AB: 152; 125x: B seen averted vision only, wide. -85% PRO, it is not binary.
06h 46m 46.53s -06° 08' 41.2" P.A. 190.00 sep 13.0 mag 8.35,11.24 Sp A0 dist. 269.54 pc (879.24 l.y.)

STF 969 AB: 152; 125x: 1 Dm, well split.  -25% PRO, it is not binary.
06h 47m 57.37s -11° 06' 30.4" P.A. 317.00 sep 7.4 mag 7.80,9.83 Sp B9 dist. 483.09 pc (1575.84 l.y.)

STF 985 AB: 152; 125x: Slightly unequal, wide.
06h 53m 56.06s -04° 23' 32.8" P.A. 323.00 sep 32.6 mag 7.78,8.39 Sp K5 dist. 540.54 pc (1763.24 l.y.)

STF 986 AB: 152; 125x: Lovely unequal pair, well split, part of a long arc asterism of six stars.  84% PRO, 881 AU WS, 1.9+1.5 Msol, it is possibly binary and needs an orbit.
06h 54m 54.08s +09° 29' 56.5" P.A. 163.00 sep 5.5 mag 8.26,9.02 Sp A2

STF 987 AB: 152; 125x: Nice close split, seen with 125x but better at 200x, white, near equal.  47% PRO, only 265 AU WS, 2.5+2.7 Msol, it is likely binary and needs an orbit.
06h 54m 08.59s -05° 51' 08.6" P.A. 177.00 sep 1.4 mag 7.07,7.20 Sp A6Vn dist. 163.67 pc (533.89 l.y.)

STF 988 AB: 152; 125x: Wide, near equal.  41% PRO, 18,886 AU WS, 2.5+2.5 Msol, it is very far away to be binary, but an orbit should be tried.
06h 53m 59.18s -10° 02' 12.8" P.A. 265.00 sep 33.2 mag 9.43,9.69 Sp A2

STF 989 AB: 152; 125x: Near equal, well split.  -81% PRO, it is not binary.
06h 54m 47.88s +03° 33' 31.7" P.A. 215.00 sep 8.6 mag 9.74,10.60 Sp K0

STF 992 AB: 152; 125x: Slightly unequal, wide.  40% PRO, 1,317 AU WS, 1.3+1.0 Msol, it is possibly binary and an orbit should be tried.
06h 55m 37.68s -09° 29' 23.0" P.A. 300.00 sep 13.9 mag 8.70,9.91 Sp G0 dist. 91.24 pc (297.62 l.y.)

STF 995 AB: 152; 125x: Superwide, equal.  -79% PRO, it is not binary.
06h 57m 12.90s +11° 00' 36.7" P.A. 293.00 sep 21.8 mag 9.68,10.44

STF 998 AB: 152; 125x: Very nice close white pair.  27% PRO, 876 AU WS, 2.2+2.1 Msol, it is possibly binary and an orbit should be tried.
06h 56m 52.88s -05° 28' 44.6" P.A. 211.00 sep 3.2 mag 8.71,8.92 Sp A5 dist. 1162.79 pc (3793.02 l.y.)

STF 999 AB: 152; 125x: Listed in WDS as XMI 31.  1 Dm, wide.  -82% PRO, it is not binary.
06h 56m 44.52s -09° 00' 55.6" P.A. 309.00 sep 22.2 mag 9.00,11.40 Sp B7V

STF1003 AB: 152; 125x: Very delicate faint equal pair, close split at 125x.  6% PRO, 1,284 AU WS, 2.0+1.8 Msol, there is some possibility it's binary, an orbit should be tried.
06h 58m 34.62s -09° 10' 02.3" P.A. 321.00 sep 3.9 mag 9.57,9.92 Sp F2

STF1010 AC: 152; 125x: Equal, wide.  -78% PRO, it is not binary.
07h 01m 27.05s -03° 07' 03.3" P.A. 7.00 sep 22.3 mag 7.68,8.77 Sp O8.5IV dist. 49.68 pc (162.06 l.y.)

STF1015 AB: 152; 125x: Faint equal pair, well separated. -33% PRO, it is not binary.
07h 04m 55.36s -05° 46' 28.4" P.A. 199.00 sep 4.9 mag 9.41,9.40 Sp A0

D 12 AB: 152; 125x: Fairly bright A, 2 Dm B, rather wide.  90% PRO, 7,201 AU WS, 7.2+2.9 Msol, it is likely binary and needs an orbit.
07h 05m 49.64s -10° 39' 36.3" P.A. 282.00 sep 6.4 mag 6.51,10.08 Sp B0.5V dist. 14285.71 pc (46599.99 l.y.)

STF1019 AC: 152; 125x: Fairly bright A, 2 Dm B, very wide.  13% PRO, 40,336 AU WS, 7.2+3.3 Msol, is is not likely binary due to the wide weighted separation, but an orbit should be tried all the same.
07h 05m 49.64s -10° 39' 36.3" P.A. 292.00 sep 38.2 mag 6.51,9.55 Sp B0.5V dist. 14285.71 pc (46599.99 l.y.)

STF1028 AB: 152; 125x: Wide, equal.  32% PRO, 11,464 AU WS, 4.8+2.6 Msol, but the RVD 3.5 > EV 1.1, it is not binary.
07h 08m 16.08s -10° 37' 25.8" P.A. 303.00 sep 11.0 mag 8.59,11.10 Sp G5

STF1029 AB: 152; 125x: Near equal, hairline split with 125x, better seen 150x, light yellow-orange stars. 79% PRO, 337 AU WS, 2.5+2.2 Msol, it is likely binary and needs an orbit.
07h 07m 56.87s -04° 40' 39.8" P.A. 26.00 sep 1.6 mag 7.47,7.95 Sp A9V dist. 225.23 pc (734.7 l.y.)

STF1030 AB: 152; 125x: Wide equal stars.  -92% PRO, it is not binary.
07h 08m 48.92s -08° 40' 36.6" P.A. 45.00 sep 15.8 mag 8.52,9.87 Sp K2III dist. 699.3 pc (2281.12 l.y.)

STF1034 AB: 152; 200x: Very fine, split 125x but better seen 200x, equal white stars, part of a rectangle asterism with of three other stars of similar magnitude, slightly fainter than STF1034A.  7% PRO, 281 AU WS, 1.3+1.1 Msol, there is a slim chance it is binary, an orbit should be tried.
07h 09m 21.70s -08° 18' 58.4" P.A. 9.00 sep 2.4 mag 9.43,9.89

STF1036 AB: 152; 125x: Slightly unequal, wide, white.  -96% PRO, it is not binary.
07h 10m 12.63s -06° 16' 42.9" P.A. 102.00 sep 17.4 mag 9.22,9.92 Sp F5

STF1043 AB: 152; 150x: Exquisite close split of equal white stars.  Forms the tip of a wide triangle asterism of similar magnitude stars.  Nice rich field.  84% PRO, 977 AU WS, 2.3+2.3 Msol, it is likely binary and needs an orbit.
07h 12m 36.98s -00° 40' 46.4" P.A. 68.00 sep 2.4 mag 9.37,9.42 Sp A0

STF1045 AB: 152; 125x: Well split, 1 Dm.  -96% PRO, it is not binary.
07h 12m 42.24s -03° 10' 41.0" P.A. 236.00 sep 5.6 mag 8.01,9.08 Sp F5 dist. 73.48 pc (239.69 l.y.)

STF1049 AB: 152; 150x: Gorgeous faint unequal pair, close split at 125x, better seen 150x.  -51% PRO, it is not binary.
07h 13m 42.33s -08° 55' 31.0" P.A. 41.00 sep 3.6 mag 8.36,9.47 Sp B9.5V dist. 338.98 pc (1105.75 l.y.)

STF1052 AB: 152; 125x: Near equal wide pair, in a rich field. 40% PRO, 22,346 AU WS, 4.3+3.8 Msol, there is a chance it's binary and an orbit should be tried.
07h 14m 33.44s -10° 17' 33.5" P.A. 22.00 sep 19.9 mag 8.76,9.19 Sp B5III

STF1056 AB: 152; 125x: Pretty pair, unequal light-orange stars, 1 Dm. 79% PRO, 1,095 AU WS, 2.8+2.0 Msol, it might be binary and an orbit should be tried.
07h 15m 34.34s -01° 51' 36.8" P.A. 298.00 sep 3.9 mag 8.04,8.88 Sp G0 dist. 246.91 pc (805.42 l.y.)

STF1060 AB: 152; 125x: 1 Dm, well split.  -20% PRO, it is not binary.
07h 16m 06.71s -09° 16' 10.9" P.A. 24.00 sep 6.9 mag 8.60,9.59 Sp B7V dist. 284.9 pc (929.34 l.y.)

STF1072 AB: 152; 125x: Very wide, slightly unequal.  -83% PRO, it is not binary.
07h 19m 36.68s -04° 26' 46.7" P.A. 110.00 sep 21.8 mag 9.37,10.81 Sp A2

STF1077 AB: 152; 125x: Faint, slightly unequal white stars.  -10% PRO, it is not binary.
07h 20m 59.96s -00° 40' 13.1" P.A. 319.00 sep 5.5 mag 9.89,9.78 Sp A3

STF1084 AB: 152; 125x: Wide, >1 Dm.  -93% PRO, it is not binary.
07h 24m 01.28s -03° 58' 44.0" P.A. 284.00 sep 14.8 mag 7.20,10.00 Sp K0 dist. 3225.81 pc (10522.59 l.y.)

STF1109 AB: 152; 150x: Closely separated faint pair, equal white stars. 38% PRO, 3,023 AU WS, 3.6+3.6 Msol, it is probably binary and needs an orbit.
07h 31m 54.40s -00° 31' 30.9" P.A. 17.00 sep 3.1 mag 9.26,9.26 Sp A0

STF1111 AB: 152; 125x: Faint, wide.  -1% PRO, and with 10,571 AU WS and RVD 1.1 > EV 1.0, this is not likely binary.
07h 31m 57.66s -08° 41' 14.2" P.A. 221.00 sep 19.9 mag 8.87,9.19 Sp K0II-III

STF1112 AB: 152; 125x: Very wide, 1 Dm.  87% PRO, 682 AU WS, 1.4+0.5 Msol, but the RVD 3.6 > EV 2.2, it is not binary.
07h 32m 05.82s -08° 52' 51.3" P.A. 113.00 sep 23.9 mag 6.03,8.73 Sp F5V dist. 27.92 pc (91.08 l.y.)

STF1128 AB: 152; 125x: 1 Dm, wide.  70% PRO, 1,399 AU WS, 1.5+0.9 Msol, but RVD 2.0 > EV 1.8, it is probably not binary but an orbit should be tried, marginally possible.
07h 39m 48.82s -06° 14' 39.4" P.A. 168.00 sep 15.7 mag 7.89,10.01 Sp G4V dist. 101.21 pc (330.15 l.y.)

STF1132 AB: 152; 125x: Slightly unequal, wide, light orange stars.  -30% PRO, it is not binary.
07h 42m 12.50s -03° 31' 10.4" P.A. 234.00 sep 20.1 mag 8.13,8.49 Sp K5 dist. 288.18 pc (940.04 l.y.)

STF1133 AB: 152; 150x: Quite faint pair, closely separated, 1 Dm.  68% PRO, 958 AU WS, 1.9+1.5 Msol, and the RVD 0.8 < EV 2.5, it is very likely binary and needs an orbit tried.
07h 42m 34.02s -04° 01' 35.4" P.A. 107.00 sep 4.3 mag 8.88,9.96 Sp A5 dist. 152.21 pc (496.51 l.y.)

STF1152 AB: 152; 125x: B is quite fainter, 2 Dm, well split.  5% PRO, 1,693 AU WS, 2.5+1.6 Msol, but RVD 2.4 < EV 2.1, it is not binary.
07h 50m 59.24s -03° 07' 15.6" P.A. 313.00 sep 6.0 mag 8.41,10.29 Sp G5 dist. 316.46 pc (1032.29 l.y.)

STF1154 AB: 152; 150x: 1 Dm, close split. -16% PRO, it is not binary.
07h 52m 08.46s -03° 03' 14.9" P.A. 353.00 sep 2.8 mag 7.13,9.26 Sp A5 dist. 111.98 pc (365.28 l.y.)

STF1353 AB: 152; 150x: Faint near equal white stars, close split.  86% PRO, 339 AU WS, 1.1+1.1 Msol, it is likely binary and needs a binary.
09h 27m 39.28s +15° 44' 32.0" P.A. 125.00 sep 3.3 mag 9.91,9.98 Sp G5 dist. 96.06 pc (313.35 l.y.)

J388 AB: 152; 125x: = STF1354.  Very faint B seen with foveal coaxing, around 10" separation.  33% PRO, 2,321 AU WS, 3.2+1.6 Msol, but RVD 3.3 > EV 1.9, it is not binary.
09h 27m 32.84s +10° 53' 53.9" P.A. 351.00 sep 4.9 mag 8.62,11.80 Sp K0

STF1356 AB: 152; 200x: Hairline split in moments of good seeing, 1 Dm light orange stars.  No Gaia data for the companion.  SOC grade 2 orbit, 117.9-year period, it is near apistron now and will remain well split through 2060.
09h 28m 27.41s +09° 03' 24.4" P.A. 116.00 sep 0.9 mag 5.69,7.28 Sp F9IV dist. 33.17 pc (108.2 l.y.)

Wednesday, February 28, 2024

27 february 2024

All in all a frustrating night.  Seeing was predicted to be good but it was variable.  It was to be excellent after 1am but I didn't notice a big improvement so wrapped up at 12:30am.  Since I was on the 20-inch I dwelled on the "movement" list, a very challenging list of known binaries which would exhibit movement over the next 20 years.  The are nearly all <0.5", most <0.3".  I could not get good results, and my pointing accuracy was off.  

I spent most of the night though going after Procyon B.  My white whale.  It's supposed to be at 5" separation to the north, and now through 2026 is the prime time to go for it.  I made another occulting eyepiece using a 9mm orthoscopic, and this time I'm happy it has a crisp edge and doesn't flare, though there is one area where it presents a ghost image (but I check for it by rotating the eyepiece).  I looked long and hard with just the 9mm and with a 2x barlow, and checked all quadrants, and nothing.  A couple times I noticed a hard point within one of the spider vane spikes, but after waiting an hour did not see it move off the spike.  The occulting band (a strip of tin foil) has a slightly uneven part which I found useful in hiding the primary behind to show more than 90-degrees of sky -- but no sign of the star.  I hope for a better night.  Perhaps it was the transparency, causing the sky to be too bright to show the faint companion.  It didn't help there was a waning moon rising at around 10pm.

I observed, or tried to, a few items from the movement list, but the conditions didn't support it.  I observed a couple of them which are beyond detectability, only to put a marker in them to compare years from now when they are.

STF1223 AB: 508; 150x: Near equal bright white stars, well separated. -8% PRO, 551 AU WS, 2.4+2.4 Msol, divergent proper motion, it is not binary. 
08h 26m 47.08s +26° 56' 07.8" P.A. 218.00 sep 5.2 mag 6.16,6.21 Sp A3V+A6V dist. 84.53 pc (275.74 l.y.)

STF1171 AB: 508; 300x: Very delicate faint B, closely separated from bright light-yellow A. -18% PRO, and even though there is only 186 AU WS, it is not likely binary.
08h 01m 00.78s +23° 34' 59.2" P.A. 326.00 sep 2.1 mag 6.48,9.95 Sp K1III-IV dist. 87.95 pc (286.89 l.y.)

COU 384 AB: 508; 1200x: Single at all powers.  No parallax data for the companion.  SOC grade 3 orbit, it is now closing rapidly and not likely to be detectible until apastron in 2050.  40.43-year period.
09h 18m 16.92s +18° 46' 51.7" P.A. 56.00 sep 0.125" mag 8.20,8.30 Sp F0 dist. 135.87 pc (443.21 l.y.)
RST3603 AB: 508; 850x: Very barest of splits with seeing, which is stable only in fleeting moments.  No parallax data for the companion.  SOC grade 3 orbit, 99-year period, it is just coming off apastron and will tighten to undetectability by 2040. 
08h 43m 07.66s -12° 25' 19.0" P.A. 317.00 sep 0.353" mag 7.80,9.61 Sp F3/5IV dist. 110.13 pc (359.24 l.y.)
MTG 1 AB: 508; 1200x: Single all powers, will widen rapidly from now to 2030 apastron and should be splitable.  No Gaia data.  Worth an annual look.  16.19-year period, SOC grade 3 orbit.
07h 11m 11.44s +43° 29' 58.1" P.A. 190.00 sep 0.06" mag 9.80,9.90 Sp M6.5+M6.5
KUI  23 AB: 508; 1200x: Single all powers.  SOC grade 2 orbit, it is at periastron now but will rapidly widen to apastron in 2028 and should be splitable.  No Gaia data.
06h 04m 07.22s +23° 15' 49.1" P.A. 358.00 sep 0.093" mag 4.77,5.50 Sp G7III dist. 47.55 pc (155.11 l.y.)
COU 292 AB: 508; 1200x: Single all powers.  No Gaia data.  SOC grade 2 orbit, 25.02-year orbit, it will tighten and not be detectible again until 2045 apastron, and even then it will be ~0.185"
10h 26m 54.22s +19° 30' 44.9" P.A. 50.00 sep 0.173" mag 8.42,8.79 Sp F8 dist. 79.05 pc (257.86 l.y.)

Friday, February 9, 2024

6 february 2024

After more weeks of storms, we had a clear night finally.  Seeing was to be average and transparency poor.  Because of various chores I wasn't free until 9:30pm, and had resigned myself to watching YouTube videos.  But as the computer was turning on, I shamed myself into going outside to observe.  After all, getting a telescope was my way of not wasting my time in the evenings, to be in the world.  So I bundled up and in 10 minutes, after taking the scope's tarp off, I was observing with the 6-inch refractor.  It was dewy, and transparency really was poor, but seeing was ok in the 6-inch and I was even seeing airy disks and nice round diffraction rings with higher powers.  After aligning on Sirius then Dubhe, I proceeded to cover Struves in Ursa Major.  Then a C-shaped cloud, looking a lot like Barnard's Loop, covered that part of the sky, so I swung down to Canis Minor, until the whole sky was cloudy.  So much time has passed between sessions, Gemini is past meridian by the time I started.  I hope there will be a gap in the weather soon so I can go to a dark site.

STF1402 AB: 152; 125x: Wide, 1 Dm, red A.  There is a with a wide third another 1 Dm from B (GIR 2 AC).  -97% PRO, it is not binary.
10h 04m 54.93s +55° 29' 16.5" P.A. 105.00 sep 33.1 mag 7.91,8.92 Sp K5 dist. 520.83 pc (1698.95 l.y.)

STF1425 AB: 152; 150x: Close, faint, unequal white pair, half a delta magnitude, split with 125x but better seen 150x. -4% PRO, 1,395 AU WS, 1.7+1.5 Msol, and RVD 0.6 < EV 2.0.  It might be binary, an orbit should be tried.
10h 21m 34.14s +46° 09' 07.6" P.A. 358.00 sep 4.8 mag 9.89,10.74 Sp F5 dist. 144.51 pc (471.39 l.y.)

STF1427 AB: 152; 125x: Easy near equal, well separated.  PRO 0%, 1,322 AU WS, 1.8+1.6 Msol, RVD 0.4 < EV 2.1, so it might be binary and an orbit should be tried.
10h 22m 00.53s +43° 54' 19.3" P.A. 214.00 sep 9.3 mag 8.18,8.54 Sp F5V dist. 105.04 pc (342.64 l.y.)

STF1428 AB: 152; 150x: Close but not difficult unequal stars, best seen 150-200x.  86% PRO, 226 AU WS, 1.3+1.4 Msol, it is likely binary and an orbit should be tried.
10h 25m 59.00s +52° 37' 18.3" P.A. 88.00 sep 2.8 mag 8.02,8.44 Sp F6V dist. 87.11 pc (284.15 l.y.)

STF1430 AB: 152; 125x: Very faint and wide B seen with averted vision only.  -24% PRO, it is not binary.
10h 25m 41.11s +40° 54' 39.4" P.A. 272.00 sep 21.2 mag 8.20,12.10 Sp G5III dist. 510.2 pc (1664.27 l.y.)

STF1436 AB: 152; 125x: Faint wide B needs averted vision to see, then can hold direct.  81% PRO, 1,300 AU WS, 1.5+1.0, and RVD 1.5 < EV 1.8, it is likely binary and needs an orbit.
10h 30m 22.86s +56° 21' 20.0" P.A. 254.00 sep 10.5 mag 8.78,10.39 Sp F5 dist. 118.48 pc (386.48 l.y.)

STF1460 AB: 152; 125x: Fairly close, but still easy with low power, white, unequal stars.  -14% PRO, 489 AU WS, 1.5+1.5 Msol, it is not likely binary.
10h 40m 35.04s +42° 09' 11.6" P.A. 161.00 sep 3.9 mag 8.72,8.90 Sp F2 dist. 185.87 pc (606.31 l.y.)

STF1461 AB: 152; 125x: Well separated >1 Dm, with STF1463 double in field.  -10% PRO, it is not likley binary.
10h 41m 59.31s +46° 38' 59.7" P.A. 137.00 sep 9.1 mag 8.61,10.31 Sp A5V dist. 423.73 pc (1382.21 l.y.)

STF1463 AB: 152; 125x: 1 Dm, well separated.  In the same field as STF1461 and looks similar to it, a little more closely separated.  These two form an equal triangle with a star of similar magnitude, but which is not itself double. -85 PRO, it is not binary.
10h 42m 54.25s +46° 41' 25.2" P.A. 258.00 sep 7.9 mag 9.30,10.42 Sp G5

STF1462 AB: 152; 125x: B is faint but easily seen with low power, well separated, white.  6% PRO, 904 AU WS, 1.9+1.0 Msol, RVD 2.5 > EV 2.4.  Hard to say it's binary and not just comoving, an orbit should be tried.
10h 42m 52.23s +50° 47' 57.3" P.A. 174.00 sep 8.1 mag 7.41,10.10 Sp A8IV dist. 129.2 pc (421.45 l.y.)

STF1465 AB: 152; 150x: Close near equal light orange stars, can split at 125x but better seen 150x.  23% PRO, 1,884 AU WS, 3.4+3.1 Msol, it is possibly binary and needs an orbit.
10h 43m 13.35s +44° 37' 41.6" P.A. 11.00 sep 2.2 mag 9.79,10.10 Sp K2

STF1467 AB: 152; 125x: Close pair, significant delta magnitude, white.  25% PRO, 1,425 AU WS, 2.8+1.5 Msol, it's possibly binary and needs an orbit.
10h 45m 15.60s +44° 58' 11.2" P.A. 288.00 sep 3.9 mag 8.58,10.76 Sp K0III dist. 239.23 pc (780.37 l.y.)

STF1475 AB: 152; 125x: Very wide, faint B seen with averted vision only.  -93% PRO, it is not binary.
10h 49m 25.90s +41° 23' 24.2" P.A. 186.00 sep 26.6 mag 7.89,11.30 Sp G0 dist. 96.34 pc (314.26 l.y.)

STF1483 AB: 152; 150x: Faint near equal light orange stars.  -31% PRO it is not binary. 
10h 54m 30.84s +47° 29' 35.8" P.A. 243.00 sep 2.3 mag 9.52,9.61 Sp G5 dist. 52.85 pc (172.4 l.y.)

STF1484 AB: 152; 125x: Wide B seen with averted vision.  -93% PRO, it is not binary.  BC is not binary either, -41% PRO.
10h 54m 36.71s +45° 27' 57.3" P.A. 4.00 sep 18.3 mag 10.10,12.60 Sp K0

STF1485 AB: 152; 125x: Wide, faint, needs averted vision. -80% PRO, it is not binary.
10h 54m 37.97s +43° 34' 58.9" P.A. 218.00 sep 18.6 mag 8.74,11.50 Sp K0 dist. 531.91 pc (1735.09 l.y.)

STF1486 AB: 152; 125x: Wide near equal stars.  -81% PRO, it is not binary.
10h 55m 01.14s +52° 07' 18.2" P.A. 100.00 sep 31.6 mag 8.45,9.69 Sp K5 dist. 420.17 pc (1370.59 l.y.)

STF1488 AB: 152; 125x: Wide, faint B, need averted vision to see better.  -30% PRO, it is not binary.
10h 56m 47.77s +52° 11' 00.9" P.A. 214.00 sep 20.0 mag 8.17,11.20 Sp A3 dist. 109.29 pc (356.5 l.y.)

STF1494 AB: 152; 125x: Wide pair, B is faint seen with averted vision then can hold direct.  1% PRO, 520 AU WS, 0.9+0.6 Msol, RVD 1.3 < EV 2.3, it is possibly binary and an orbit should be tried.
10h 58m 25.63s +37° 01' 43.8" P.A. 331.00 sep 10.7 mag 8.85,10.62 Sp G5 dist. 53.73 pc (175.27 l.y.)

STF1525 AB: 152; 150x: Excellent near equal pair, faint, medium power is best since high power blurs the image.  Good close split, with seeing.  65% PRO, 521 AU WS, 1.6+1.5 Msol, RVD 0.1 < EV 3.2, it is probably binary and needs an orbit.
11h 19m 29.37s +47° 28' 12.6" P.A. 173.00 sep 2.3 mag 9.90,9.93 Sp F5 dist. 325.73 pc (1062.53 l.y.)

STF1579 AB-C: 152; 125x: 2 Dm close companion, still split with low power.  -54% PRO, it is not binary (nor is AB-D, only AB is binary).
11h 55m 05.74s +46° 28' 36.6" P.A. 44.00 sep 3.7 mag 6.68,8.32 Sp A3Vn dist. 211.86 pc (691.09 l.y.)

STF1541 AB: 152; 125x: Faint B 2 Dm, well split.  -14% PRO, it si not binary.
11h 27m 39.46s +46° 17' 33.4" P.A. 27.00 sep 7.8 mag 7.97,10.13 Sp F8 dist. 89.29 pc (291.26 l.y.)

STF1542 AB: 152; 150x: Very pretty white and 2 Dm B, close but comfortably split with both 125x and 150x.  -9% PRO, it is not binary.
11h 27m 56.02s +44° 33' 57.0" P.A. 267.00 sep 3.9 mag 6.93,9.65 Sp F2V dist. 88.89 pc (289.96 l.y.)

STF1586 AB: 152; 200x: Excellent!  Split with seeing, a very good close split nearly 2 Dm, faint.  82% PRO, 285 AU WS, 1.8+1.2 Msol, it is very likely binary and an orbit should be tried.
11h 56m 53.86s +40° 21' 21.5" P.A. 255.00 sep 1.5 mag 8.83,10.37 Sp F8 dist. 147.49 pc (481.11 l.y.)

STF1515 AB: 152; 125x: = HJ  494, near equal, wide.  Parallax data missing for the companion.
11h 13m 03.64s +40° 11' 03.9" P.A. 140.00 sep 31.2 mag 10.70,10.85 Sp F8+G0

STF1543 AB: 152; 125x: Yellow-white, 2 Dm, well split.  12% PRO, 362 AU WS, 2.3+1.1 Msol, it could be binary and an orbit should be tried.
11h 29m 04.12s +39° 20' 13.1" P.A. 354.00 sep 5.5 mag 5.35,10.67 Sp A2V dist. 65.23 pc (212.78 l.y.)

STF1569 AB: 152; 150x: Excellent, faint unequal pair, dark yellow.  Close split at 125x & 150x. -7% PRO, it is not binary.  
11h 44m 18.43s +39° 00' 24.5" P.A. 321.00 sep 3.7 mag 8.83,10.59 Sp F0 dist. 307.69 pc (1003.68 l.y.)

STF1533 A-BC: 152; 125x: Easy wide pair, near equal.  -81% PRO, it is not binary.  
11h 22m 07.07s +37° 05' 15.1" P.A. 173.00 sep 23.1 mag 9.25,9.43 Sp G0 dist. 374.53 pc (1221.72 l.y.)

STF1524 AB: 152; 125x: Very unequal, well split. Alula Borealis.  87% PRO, 926 AU WS, 5.4+1.3 Msol, it is likely binary and needs an orbit tried.
11h 18m 28.74s +33° 05' 39.5" P.A. 147.00 sep 7.0 mag 3.64,10.10 Sp K3IIIBaO dist. 122.4 pc (399.27 l.y.)

STF1182 AB: 152; 125x: Unequal, well split.  60% PRO, 1,336 AU WS, 2.9+2.2 Msol, it is likely binary and needs an orbit.
08h 05m 24.43s +05° 49' 38.9" P.A. 75.00 sep 4.9 mag 7.48,8.76 Sp B9 dist. 328.95 pc (1073.03 l.y.)

STF1185 AB: 152; 125x: Faint, slightly unequal, close split.  24% PRO, 348 AU WS, 1.1+0.9 Msol, RVD 0.5 < EV 3.2, it is probably binary and needs an orbit.
08h 07m 07.38s +01° 20' 46.5" P.A. 94.00 sep 3.8 mag 9.59,10.26 Sp K0

STF1198 AB: 152; 125x: Near equal, wide.  -90% PRO, it is not binary.
08h 11m 15.97s +01° 16' 05.5" P.A. 338.00 sep 33.4 mag 8.72,8.77 Sp G0